U.S. Supreme Court
Representation at every stage before the Court, from assessing whether a case is certworthy to arguing it at the lectern.
- Petitions for certiorari and briefs in opposition
- Merits and reply briefs
- Oral argument
Supreme Court & Federal Appellate Litigation
Wang Law PLLC is a boutique litigation practice focused on the U.S. Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeals. Clients work directly with Xiao Wang, a two-time winning Supreme Court advocate trained at Williams & Connolly and Yale Law School, from strategy through briefing and oral argument.
Xiao Wang’s cases and commentary have been covered by
Practice
The firm represents individuals, companies, organizations, and fellow counsel at every stage of federal appellate litigation, from shaping the record in the trial court to arguing before the Supreme Court.
Representation at every stage before the Court, from assessing whether a case is certworthy to arguing it at the lectern.
Briefing and argument in all thirteen federal circuits, for appellants and appellees alike.
Briefs for organizations, scholars, and coalitions that can give a court a perspective the parties cannot.
Appellate judgment for cases still in the trial court, and rigorous preparation for advocates handling their own arguments.
The Firm
You work with Xiao Wang himself on the strategy, the writing, and the argument. Your matter is not handed off to a team of junior lawyers.
Appeals turn on framing. The work starts with the question presented and the standard of review, and builds each brief around the arguments most likely to carry the case.
Xiao founded the En Banc Institute, a national program that prepares advocates through demanding moot panels. The firm brings the same discipline to every argument it handles.
Flexible engagements. The firm can serve as lead counsel, as co-counsel alongside your trial team or litigation firm, or on a targeted basis for strategy, brief review, and moots.
Start a conversationRepresentative Experience
These matters were handled by Xiao Wang before he founded Wang Law PLLC, in private practice and as director of law school appellate clinics. They are not matters of the firm. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Argued for the petitioner in a Title VII case asking whether plaintiffs from majority groups must meet a heightened “background circumstances” standard. The Court unanimously rejected that rule, holding that Title VII’s protections apply equally to every individual.
Argued for the petitioners, participants in university retirement plans, on what plaintiffs must plead to state a prohibited-transaction claim under ERISA. The Court unanimously held that plaintiffs need not plead around the statute’s exemptions.
| Case | Court | Area | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stanard v. Dy88 F.4th 811 (2023) | Ninth Circuit | Bivens | Argued | Unanimous decision for appellant |
| Spillard v. Ivers2023 WL 4992827 (2023) | Ninth Circuit | Prisoner civil rights | Supervised | Unanimous decision for appellant |
| Dickinson v. Cochran833 F. App’x 268 (2020) | Eleventh Circuit | Qualified immunity | BriefedDecided without oral argument | Unanimous decision for appellant |
| Lee v. United States974 F.3d 670 (2020) | Sixth Circuit | Federal sentencing | Argued | Decision for appellant |
| Roberts v. Mars Petcare US, Inc.874 F.3d 953 (2017) | Sixth Circuit | Class action / complex litigation | Argued | — |
Attorney
Xiao Wang is the founder of Wang Law PLLC. His practice centers on the U.S. Supreme Court and the federal courts of appeals, where he has briefed and argued cases involving employment discrimination, ERISA, civil rights, and federal sentencing.
In the Supreme Court’s October 2024 Term, Xiao argued two cases, Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services and Cunningham v. Cornell University, and won both unanimously. He was twice named a Law360 Legal Lion of the Week in 2025, and his cases have been covered by The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and others.
Before founding the firm, Xiao was a litigation associate at Williams & Connolly LLP and Wilkinson Stekloff LLP in Washington, D.C. He clerked for Judge Karen Nelson Moore of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and for Judge Lucy H. Koh, then of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Earlier in his career, he was a business analyst at McKinsey & Company and a policy analyst for the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.
Xiao also teaches at the University of Virginia School of Law, where he directs the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, and he founded the En Banc Institute and the National Appellate Clinic Network. His scholarship on federal courts, constitutional law, and law and religion has appeared in the Cornell Law Review, Michigan Law Review, Columbia Law Review, and Vanderbilt Law Review, among others.
Independent practice. Wang Law PLLC is a private law practice. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the University of Virginia or the University of Virginia School of Law.
Scholarship & Commentary
Xiao writes on the Supreme Court, federal courts, constitutional law, and law and religion, for law reviews and general audiences alike.
Contact
Wang Law PLLC takes on a select number of Supreme Court and appellate engagements. To discuss a potential appeal, co-counsel arrangement, amicus brief, or moot, email or call the firm.
xiao@xwanglaw.com